• Home
  • About
  • Objectives
  • Membership
  • Donations
  • Activities
  • Research Reports
  • Submissions
  • Newsletters
  • Contact

SPCS

SOCIETY FOR PROMOTION OF COMMUNITY STANDARDS INC.

  • Censorship
    • Censorship & New Technology
    • Film Ratings
    • Films
  • Crime
    • Rape statistics
    • Television Violence
    • Violence
    • Youth Crime
  • Enforcement
  • Family
    • Anti-smacking Bill
    • Families Commission
    • Marriage
  • Gambling Addiction
  • Political Advocacy
  • Pro-life
    • Abortion
  • Prostitution
  • Sexuality
    • Child Sex Crimes
    • Civil Unions
    • HIV/AIDS STIs
    • Homosexuality
    • Kinsey Fraud
    • Porn Link to Rape
    • Pornography
    • Sex Studies
    • Sexual Dysfunction
  • Other
    • Alcohol abuse
    • Announcement
    • Application For Leave
    • Broadcasting Standards Authority
    • Celebrating Christian Tradition
    • Children’s Television
    • Complaints to Broadcasters
    • Computer games
    • Film & Lit Board Reviews
    • Film & Lit. Board Appointments
    • Human Dignity
    • Moral Values
    • Newsletters
    • Newspaper Articles
    • Recommended Books
    • Submissions
    • YouTube

CRITIC – Otago Uni Students’ Mag – banned by Censor’s Office

February 1, 2006 by SPCS Leave a Comment

Media Release 1/02/06

In a decision dated 31 January 2006 and signed by the Chief Censor of Film and Literature, Bill Hastings, the Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC) has ruled that the Otago University Student Association’s Magazine CRITIC TE AROHI (Issue 23, Sept 19, 2005) is “objectionable” in terms of section 3(2)(b) and 3(2)(d) of the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993 (“the Act”). The Society formally submitted this obscene and offensive publication to the OFLC for classification on the 23rd of September 2005, a few days after it was published by Planet Media Dunedin Ltd. and began to be distributed freely among university students at Otago University. The Commissioner of Police (NZ) and the Drug Rape Trust (NZ) also submitted the magazine for classification.

[Read more…]

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Censorship, Rape statistics

Minister says position of Deputy Chief Censor “is not vacant”

January 31, 2006 by SPCS Leave a Comment

Media Release 31/01/06

In a letter dated 30 January 2006 the Minister of Internal Affairs, the Hon. Rick Barker, has replied to the Society’s questions regarding the positions of Deputy Chief Censor and Chief Censor, currently held respectively by Ms Nicola McCully and Mr Bill Hastings. The Minister’s answers to questions put by the Society’s secretary, on behalf of the executive committee, are highlighted below in bold.

[Read more…]

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Censorship

Censorship & New Technology

January 30, 2006 by SPCS Leave a Comment

Monday, 30 January 2006

Censorship in New Zealand: The Policy Challenges of New Technology

by David Wilson, Senior Policy Advisor, Department of Internal Affairs
Social Policy Journal of New Zealand Iss. 19, Dec. 2002

http://ics.leeds.ac.uk/papers/ks/exhibits/52/NewZealand_Policy.pdf

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Censorship & New Technology

More On $130,000+ Vacant Censor’s Position

January 27, 2006 by SPCS Leave a Comment

Media Release 27/01/06

Ms Nicola McCully was appointed to the statutory position of Deputy Chief Censor of Film and Literature on the 17th September 2002 for a period of three years, commencing 1st October 2002. According to the 2003 Annual Report (p. 89) Ms McCully receives a salary package of between $130,00 and $140,000 and the The Chief Censor, Bill Hastings, receives a salary package of between $180,000 and $190,000 (“Total Remuneration and benefits”).

[Read more…]

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Censorship

Inaction on ‘Critic’ case irks Society

January 18, 2006 by SPCS Leave a Comment

Otago Daily Times
January 10th 2006 pg 4.
By Rebecca Fox
The time it is taking the censor’s office to rule on the September “Offensive Issue” of University of Otago student magazine Critic makes a farce of the process, Society for the Promotion of Community Standards spokesman David Lane says.
The Office of Film and Literature Classification received multiple submissions from the public about the issue, which caused concern over an article on drug rape that was labelled a “how to guide”.

[Read more…]

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Censorship

« Previous Page
Next Page »
SPCS Facebook Page

Subscribe to website updates:

The Pilgrim’s Progress

Getting "The Pilgrim’s Progress" to
every prisoner in NZ prisons.

Recent Comments

  • John on The term ‘Homophobia’: Its Origins and Meanings, and its uses in Homosexual Agenda
  • SPCS on Corporate corruption in New Zealand – “Banning badly behaving company directors”
  • Anne on Corporate corruption in New Zealand – “Banning badly behaving company directors”
  • Jake on John Clancy: Troubled Global group costs Christchurch City Council another $37,000
  • Jake on John Clancy: Troubled Global group costs Christchurch City Council another $37,000

Family Values & Community Standards

  • Coalition for Marriage
  • ECPAT New Zealand
  • Family Voice Australia
  • Parents Inc.

Internet Safety

  • Netsafe Internet Safety Group

Pro-Life Groups

  • Family Life International
  • Right to Life
  • The Nathaniel Centre
  • Voice for Life
(Click here for larger image)

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.