• Home
  • About
  • Objectives
  • Membership
  • Donations
  • Activities
  • Research Reports
  • Submissions
  • Newsletters
  • Contact

SPCS

SOCIETY FOR PROMOTION OF COMMUNITY STANDARDS INC.

  • Censorship
    • Censorship & New Technology
    • Film Ratings
    • Films
  • Crime
    • Rape statistics
    • Television Violence
    • Violence
    • Youth Crime
  • Enforcement
  • Family
    • Anti-smacking Bill
    • Families Commission
    • Marriage
  • Gambling Addiction
  • Political Advocacy
  • Pro-life
    • Abortion
  • Prostitution
  • Sexuality
    • Child Sex Crimes
    • Civil Unions
    • HIV/AIDS STIs
    • Homosexuality
    • Kinsey Fraud
    • Porn Link to Rape
    • Pornography
    • Sex Studies
    • Sexual Dysfunction
  • Other
    • Alcohol abuse
    • Announcement
    • Application For Leave
    • Broadcasting Standards Authority
    • Celebrating Christian Tradition
    • Children’s Television
    • Complaints to Broadcasters
    • Computer games
    • Film & Lit Board Reviews
    • Film & Lit. Board Appointments
    • Human Dignity
    • Moral Values
    • Newsletters
    • Newspaper Articles
    • Recommended Books
    • Submissions
    • YouTube

From jail to mansion for conman Michael Andrew Swann

July 16, 2013 by SPCS Leave a Comment

A FRAUDSTER who still owes millions of dollars will be freed from jail to live with a prominent Christchurch businessman in his Banks Peninsular mansion.

Michael Andrew Swann, 51, will be paroled to Alasdair Cassels’ Governors Bay property, valued at about $1.35 million.

The home has an indoor pool, harbour views and is surrounded by a vineyard.

Mr Cassels confirmed yesterday that Swann would be living with him and his family, but only for a short time.

He said he received a call for help from Swann, who needed a place to stay after the Parole Board ruled another proposed address was unsuitable.

Mr Cassels first met Swann many years ago, but did not consider him a close friend. “The guy’s served his time and he’s trying to get himself rehabilitated – trying to get himself back into the workforce. Why should he be cast on the rubbish heap?”

Swann will be employed  by a Christchurch company doing engineering and biotech work.

Swann’s release from Christchurch Men’s Prison comes after he has served less than half of his jail sentence. His release date is July 31.

Swann and his associate, Kerry Harford, were found guilty in 2008 of defrauding the then–Otago District Health Board of about $16.9m by invoicing the board for bogus computer-related services.

Swann, the health board IT manager at the time, was sentenced to nine-and-a-half years’ jail with a non-parole period of four and-a-half years. He was ordered to repay the Crown $9.5m.

A Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment spokesperson said yesterday that only $3.2m had been recovered through the sale of seized assets, but the case “remains open”.

Swann has acknowledged it is unlikely he will ever be able to repay the sum in full.

Former health board chairman Richard Thomson, who was sacked by Health Minister Tony Ryall after Swann was sentenced, said he was angry the “sociopath” would be released at his first attempt at parole.

Mr Thomson, now a Southern District Health Board member and a Dunedin city councillor, said Swann still refused to co-operate with the district health board over outstanding legal matters.

His refusal to sign a document continued to cost it money.

“He’s a nasty piece of work,” Mr Thomson said.

Swann had hoped to live at his boss’ address, but the Parole Board was concerned at the potential for “collusion”.

Swann appeared before the Parole Board again last month.

A psychologist’s report assessed Swann as at low risk of reoffending and prison staff supported him in letters to the board.

As part of his release conditions, he is not to be involved in the oversight of any business, or handle another person’s money or invoices relating to any business or commercial enterprise.

Source:

The Dominion Post. Tuseday, July 16, 2013, p. A2

Story by Blair Ensor

Fairfax NZ

Further reading:

1. SPCS Report: 11/11/2010

https://www.spcs.org.nz/2010/michael-swann-checketts-mckay-fraud-and-otago-dhbs-missing-6-million-report/

2. Convicted fraudster Swann freed

by Rosie Manins. 16 July 2013

http://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/264949/convicted-fraudster-swann-freed

Quote:

Former ODHB chairman Richard Thomson said Swann’s release was not a surprise, but it was disappointing. He said Swann was not remorseful and the only lesson he had learned was not to get caught.

”My understanding is he will be going to live in a property that most of us can only dream about. And he will be doing so despite continuing to cause the population of Otago and Southland lost health opportunities as a result of his refusal during his prison term to engage with the board.”

Mr Thomson was board chairman for part of the time when Swann’s fraud occurred and consequently was sacked from that position in 2009 by Health Minister Tony Ryall. He remains a member of the Southern District Health Board.

Mr Thomson said Swann had caused the board ongoing legal costs but could have prevented the extra expense ”with a signature and at no cost to himself”.

”I believe he’s done that deliberately, and I find it extraordinary the parole board has either not sought to establish whether he has co-operated in any way, or that the parole board has not considered his failure to do so indicative of his lack of remorse.

”The primary issue is whether this man co-operated to put right what he did that was wrong and I know, but am not at liberty to detail, that he has failed to do so.

”That to me is indicative of both his personality and of his complete absence of remorse,” Mr Thomson said.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Crime, Enforcement Tagged With: defrauding, fraudster, Kerry Harford, Michael Andrew Swann, Michael Swann, ODHB, Otago Dstrict Health Board, Parole Board

More jail for Capital + Merchant Finance pair

June 30, 2013 by SPCS Leave a Comment

Jailed Capital + Merchant Finance directors Wayne Leslie Douglas and Neal Medhurst Nicholls have had their record-setting prison sentences increased after pleading guilty to misleading investors.

They appeared before Justice Geoff Venning for sentencing in Auckland High Court today having, in February, pleaded guilty to five charges between them of signing prospectuses that contained false statements between 2006 and December 2007.

The misleading statements included information about Capital + Merchant’s liquidity and cashflow, management of loans and related-party lending.

Douglas was sentenced to eight months’ imprisonment and Nicholls was sentenced to 12 months on the charges, brought by the Financial Markets Authority.

The jail time is on top of the seven and a half year jail terms they are currently serving for fraud after a prosecution by the Serous Fraud Office [SFO] last year.

See full story here by Georgina Bond:

Published Friday June 28, 2013

http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/more-jail-capital-merchant-finance-pair-gb-142172

See earlier story published 15/02/13

http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/prison-garbed-duo-admit-misleading-investors-gb-135950

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Crime, Enforcement Tagged With: Capital + Merchant Finance, Financial Markets Authority, FMA, Fraud, misleading investors, Neal Medhurst Nicholls, Serious Fraud Office, SFO, Wayne Leslie Douglas

Ex-hotel boss wins pay case against Chow brothers

June 29, 2013 by SPCS Leave a Comment

A PAST employee of the Chow brothers will finally receive some of the money he is owed by the Wellington sex entrepreneurs.

Former general manager James Jesudhass was awarded nearly $120,000 after the Employment Court found he was unfairly dismissed.

Liquidators were days from going to court to recover what they considered to be a voidable transaction from Michael and John Chow’s company Just Hotel when they offered to settle.

The Just Hotel, in Willis St, was sold in 2008 and put into liquidation in 2009. That same year, after protracted mediation and drawn-out legal proceedings, the Employment Court found Mr Jesudhass had been unfairly dismissed from his job four years earlier.

He was awarded $119,237, but the company had not paid a cent.

The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment claimed the company had made an insolvent transaction from Just Hotel to the Chow Group in an alleged bid to avoid the Employment Court settlement.

A hearing was to have taken place in the High Court at Wellington last month.

In the final liquidator’s report, issued last week, Official Assignee liquidator Marc Graham said that, after the issuing of a voidable notice, “as expected the creditor filed an objection in response”.

“Prior to the scheduled hearing date the liquidator presented the creditor with a settlement offer which, after some deliberation, was accepted.”

A ministry spokesman would not disclose the sum obtained, but said the distribution to creditors was likely to be about 30 cents in the dollar.

“The Official Assignee’s move to settle out of court avoided a costly court case and possible appeal – expenses which have been taken out of the dividend,” the spokesman said.

The recovered funds were put into the liquidator’s trust account and would be used to pay costs and make a partial payment to Mr Jesudhass and another creditor.

Mr Jesudhass, who now lives in Dunedin, said he was delighted the matter had been settled.

Though he may not receive the full amount he was owed, he was “just glad [it] finally did have to pay”.

Source:

1. Ex-hotel boss wins pay case against Chows by Marty Sharpe

The Dominion Post: 29 June 2013 p. A21

Further background reading see;

1. Hotel boss gets $120,000 after dismissal by Paul Easton 3/04/09

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/2330603/Hotel-boss-gets-120-000-after-dismissal

2. Man gets huge payout for unfair dismissal.

TVNZ – OneNews. 13/04/09 Source NZPA

http://tvnz.co.nz/content/2638938/423466.html

A former hotel manager has been awarded $120,000 after being unfairly dismissed from his job.

The Employment Court found James Jesudhass was unfairly dismissed while in mediation over his job at the Just Hotel in Wellington four years ago.

The court ordered the hotel’s owners, brothers John and Michael Chow, to pay him   $119,237, including $68,000 in lost wages, $20,000 for loss of a car and $10,000 for distress.

The brother’s had suspended Jesudhass from work soon after the mediation about management issues began, and then dismissed him two weeks later.

Judge Barrie Travis said the defendant’s actions were both procedurally unfair and substantively unjustified.

The hotel on Willis St has since changed hands

3, Shoddy treatments costs Just Hotel $120,000 by Greg Cain, 21/04/09

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10567791

4. A case of Just how not to manage staff. The Dominion Post 25/04/09

by Peter Cullen is a partner at Cullen – the Employment Law Firm

http://www.cullenlaw.co.nz/Site/Publications_Media/2009/A_case_of_Just_how_not_to_manage_staff.aspx

5. Powell, Carol, “Casenote: Just Hotel Limited v. James Jesudhass (NZ)” (2010). ADR-related Case Notes. Paper 4. http://www.civiljustice.info/adrcases/4

6. Chow brothers face High Court action. By Blair Cunningham 21/09/12

Source: http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/chow-brothers-face-high-court-action-bc-129222

The business, innovation and employment ministry is taking high-profile property developers the Chow brothers to the High Court over an insolvent company transaction.

The Wellington-based brothers are widely known through their investment in strip clubs and brothels, including Il Bordello and Splash in Wellington.

John and Michael Chow are also behind a planned “super brothel” opposite Auckland’s Sky Tower, on the site of the demolished historic Aurora Hotel, which developed fatal cracks in its walls during refurbishment in 2010.

The decision to take the pair to the High Court relates to a transaction made between their companies Chow Group and Wellington’s Just Hotel Ltd.

It took place around the time the Willis St hotel was sold in 2008 and put into liquidation the following year.

A former manager, James Jesudhass, was awarded nearly $120,000 in costs after taking the brothers to the Employment Court, claiming he had been unfairly dismissed.

Ministry spokesman Britton Broun told NBR ONLINE the official assignee had written to the Chow brothers asking for them to set aside the undisclosed amount for the insolvent transaction. However, they wrote back, objecting.

He says that as a result papers will be filed with the High Court within the next month.

Mr Broun says even if the court action is successful, it does not necessarily guarantee Mr Jesudhass will receive any money.

If it is, the transaction will be handled by the official assignee, who will divide the money between creditors.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Enforcement Tagged With: Chow brothers, Employment Court, insolvent transaction, James Jesudhass, John Chow, Just Hotel, Just Hotel Ltd, Michael and John Chow, Michael Chow, sex entrepreneurs, voidable notice

Banned company director Graham McCready who seeks to prosecute ACT leader John Banks

June 2, 2013 by SPCS 11 Comments

Who is Graham Edward McCready, 68, the retired accountant of Miramar Wellington, who was banned on 8 March 2013 for five years from being a company director under Section 382(1) of the Companies Act 1993? The Society (“SPCS) applauds this banning order, noting that McCready unlawfully became a director on 12 February 2013 at a time when he had had a conviction for dishonesty (tax fraud) within the last five years. More recently he has been convicted on bribery (see below).  If a person is convicted of breaching the  banning order imposed under s. 382(1) he is liable under s. 373(4) of the Companies Act 1993, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years or to a fine not exceeding $200,000. McCready ceased being a company director on 2 May 2013.

McCready has been pursuing a private prosecution against ACT leader John Banks under the Local Electoral Act, for (allegedly) knowingly filing a false electoral return involving donation disclosures after his failed bid for Auckland super city mayoralty. A conviction for knowingly filing a false return carries a maximum penalty of two years in prison or a fine of $10,000.

McCready earned a public profile when he took a successful private prosecution against Hutt South Labour MP and former Cabinet Minister, Hon. Trevor Mallard in 2009, accusing him of assault over an altercation with National’ MP Tau Henare in the lobby of Parliament. The case against Mr Mallard ended when McCready accepted a guilty plea to a less serious charge of fighting in a public place. He was convicted and ordered to pay $500 to the Salvation Army drug and alcohol programme. .

McCready has been on a benefit since 1995 when, as a clerk at Wellington City Council, he developed chronic occupational overuse syndrome.

In 2006 McCready was sentenced to 75 hours’ community service for trading while bankrupt.

In April 2008 McCready appeared in the Wellington District Court on 51 tax-related fraud charges involving various clubs and body corporates he had been acting for. He was sentenced in the Wellington District Court by Judge Behrens on 27 February 2009 to six months home detention after earlier pleading guilty to 12 charges of filing false income and GST returns and filing a false income tax return to evade payment: tax fraud involving $183, 155.

Inland Revenue Acting Group Manager, Assurance, Graham Tubb, said McCready abused his position and betrayed the trust of his clients.

“McCready deliberately set out to try to cheat the system for his own personal gain. Both Inland Revenue and the courts both take a very dim view of this sort of action.”

“Our tax system relies on the honesty of the many professionals working in it, and both Inland Revenue and the public expect them to help uphold its integrity,” said Mr Tubb.

In 2010 McCready threatened to expose claims that a company director was guilty of financial impropriety and was mentally ill. He was charged with threatening to expose a defamatory libellous document with intent to cause a man to act in accordance with his will on July 5 in 2010. McCready claimed he was acting in the best interests of minority shareholders, and would keep quiet if the man surrendered his company position and signed over his majority shareholding to McCready. The problems McCready caused cost the company about $80,000 and had a devastating impact on the accused director whose name and company was suppressed by the court.

McCready was charged with blackmail and pleaded guilty on the day his trial was to have started. He was sentenced on 8 March 2013 in the High Court in Wellington to community detention – he must be at his home in the Wellington suburb of Miramar between 7 pm and 7 am for the next six months. For the sentencing, McCready wrote the victim a four-sentence apology saying he had no excuse for what he did. “My conduct was criminal, unnecessary, and I am sure caused you some considerable distress.”

On 12 March 2013, four days after being sentenced for blackmail, and just over three years after being convicted as a tax fraudster, he incorporated and became sole director and shareholder of New Zealand Private Prosecution Service Ltd (Co. No. 4284878) – a company intended to be a consumer watchdog. He resigned as director on 2 May 2013 after having appointed Richard John Creser as a new sole director (A record of Creser taking up 10% of the company shares was recorded on line by McCready on 21 March 2013).

McCready currently retains 90% of the company and he became a director illegally when he signed a Director Consent Form on 12 March 2013 and submitted it to the Registrar of Companies. “Disqualification details” on that form state clearly that “people who have been convicted of a crime involving dishonesty in the last five years or who have been prohibited from managing a company by the Registrar of Companies” cannot hold the position of company director.

Under the Crimes Act 1961, fraud and blackmail are both considered dishonesty offences, punishable by lengthy terms of imprisonment.

The Companies Office has choosen to impose a maximum ban of five years on McCready from holding the position of company director or being involved in any aspect of company management. The Companies Office has the option of applying the full force of the law on McCready, who could be liable to a maximum term of imprisonment of five years or a fine of up to $200,000 for his serial, if he breaches his banning order. Those banned from being directors by the Registrar of Companies under s. 385 of the Companies Act 1993, potentially face the same punishment if convicted of breaching any banning order [see ss. 385[9] and 374(4)].

As noted McCready stepped down as sole director of NZ Private Prosecution Service Ltd on 2 May 2013, presumably in part as a result of the media taking an active interest in his current business activities. He has had to accept that he has been knowingly operating his company in breach of Companies Office rules.

Following the removal of McCready and the change of director, the company continues today to operate from the same registered office used when McCready was director: 9b Miramar North Road, Wellington 6022. The same address is listed as the residential address of the company’s major shareholder – Mr Graham Edward McCready.

The new director Richard John Creser provides his address as 4 Rothwell Street, Titahi Bay, Porirua, 5022 , New Zealand, for his share records and on his director’s consent form dated 12 March 2012.

Is this a case of McCready retaining a controlling management role in a company that he illegally set up and now retains a controlling 90% share holding in? Has his private prosecution against Mr Banks been made by NZ Private Prosecution Service Ltd, the company he has financial interests in, so that he can avoid or minimise paying costs awarded against him should her lose the court case?   

Companies Office records do not record McCready as a banned director. Why not? If his convictions do not warrant a ban then why has he been able to become a company director despite having been convicted of dishonesty and bribery.

Even if Graham Edward McCready is given a lifetime ban from being a company director, it would appear there is nothing to stop him holding down a grandiose position as “consultant” to the company, retaining a controlling influence in it via private shareholding or shareholding held by a “family trust” or a trustee company of a “family trust” (the latter – one or both being run by his siblings or close friends).

On 24 February 2013 The Herald on Sunday reported  that McCready had filed papers in court in a private prosecution against John Banks and Don Brash, alleging the pair were  liable for the false statements in the prospectus material of Huljich Wealth Management (New Zealand) Ltd [HWMNZ] which Banks and Brash, alongside Peter Karl Christopher Huljich, helped to found in 2007.

Charges had earlier been successfully brought against Huljich, the company funds manager, by the Financial Marketing Authority (FMA) and he had pleaded guilty in 2011 of misleading investors by misrepresenting the performance of the company’s KiwiSaver scheme in offer documents between May 2008 and January 2010. He was convicted under the Securities Act and fined $112,500.

McCready believes that the FMA should have filed charges against Banks and Brash because both had been directors of HWMNZ over the period of the offending and had both signed the prospectuses that contained the acknowledged falsehoods. Brash was a director from 15/06/07 to 13/10/10 and John Banks from 15/06/07 to 29/09/11.

“Battler” Graham McCready has certainly been “a thorn in the side of authority” !

Selected References

Battler a thorn in side of authority. By Julie Jacobson. 23/12/07
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10483895

Wellington accountant sentenced on tax fraud charges. 27 February 2009

http://www.ird.govt.nz/aboutir/media-centre/media-releases/2009/media-release-2009-02-27.html

Blackmailing ‘crusader’ staying home at night. Fsairfax NZ News. 9 March 2013

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/8402684/Blackmailing-crusader-staying-home-at-night

Court date for Banks. By Matthew Backhouse. 11 November 2012.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10846573

Man charged with blackmail. 28 March 2012. Fairfax NZ News.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/6651634/Man-charged-with-blackmail

Battler a thorn in side of authority. By Julie Jacobson. 23 December 2007.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10483895

Insolvency Watch. 27 February 2009.

http://www.sharkpatrol.co.nz/blog/2009/02/wellington-accountant-graham-mccready-sentenced-on-tax-fraud-charges/

Tax allegation [made by Graham McCready] against Whitireia students association acting president.

Kapi-Mana News. 5 october 2010.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/local-papers/kapi-mana-news/4195570/Tax-allegation-against-Whitireia-students-association-acting-president

Banks, Brash in private funds probe. Sunday 24 February 2013. AAP.

http://news.msn.co.nz/nationalnews/8616080/banks-brash-in-private-fund-probe

Banks faces legal threat. Sunday 24 February 2013

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10867333

 

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Crime, Enforcement Tagged With: banned company director, bribery, dishonesty offences, disqualified director, Don Brash, Graham Edward McCready, Graham McCready, John Banks, Peter Huljich, Private Prosecution Serevice, Richard Creser, Richard John Creser, S 381(2) Companies Act, s. 385 Companies Act, tax fraud

What WILL it take for Google to block child porn? – The Daily Mail asks.

June 1, 2013 by SPCS Leave a Comment

What WILL it take for Google to block child porn? Jailed for life yesterday, April Jones’s murderer is the latest child killer to use the internet to fuel his perversion. John Carr of the Children’s Charities’ Coalition on Internet Safety said: ‘If these images were not available on the internet then men like Hazell and Bridger might not go on to kill.

  • Mark Bridger had a sickening library of violent child pornography
  • Follows revelation that Tia Sharp’s killer downloaded child abuse images
  • Calls for search sites to crack down on how paedophiles can feed fantasies
  • April’s parents sat silently during verdicts – Bridger nodded and stared up
  • Murderer given rare ‘whole-life’ prison term, meaning he will never leave jail
  • Judge calls him ‘paedophile’ with ‘sexual and morbid fantasies about girls’

Daily Mail Online Story by Paul Bentley, Paul Harris and Keith Gladdis. 30 May 2013.

Google and Microsoft last night faced demands to act over the shocking ease with which child killer Mark Bridger used the internet to fuel his perversion.

Bridger, sentenced yesterday to spend the rest of his life in jail for murdering five-year-old April Jones, had a sickening library of violent child pornography.

It follows the revelation that Stuart Hazell, the man convicted earlier this month of killing 12-year-old Tia Sharp, regularly downloaded child abuse images on his mobile phone.

Children’s charities and online protection experts are now calling for search sites to crack down on the way paedophiles can feed their fantasies with simple online searches.

Bridger used the search engines Google and Bing, which is owned by Microsoft, to look up terms including ‘naked five-year-old girls’, ‘nudism five-year-olds’ and ‘pictures of naked virgin teens’.

He also used Facebook to access  photographs of local girls, including  April and her half-sisters aged 13 and 16, and went online to save images of murdered Soham schoolgirls Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman.

Child safety charities, including the NSPCC, demanded that the internet giants introduce immediate controls to stop paedophiles gaining access to child pornography.

John Carr of the Children’s Charities’ Coalition on Internet Safety said: ‘If these images were not available on the internet then men like Hazell and Bridger might not go on to kill.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2333626/What-WILL-Google-block-child-porn-Jailed-life-yesterday-April-Joness-murderer-latest-child-killer-use-internet-fuel-perversion.html#ixzz2V7jyNpTM

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Child Sex Crimes, Crime, Enforcement, Pornography, Sexual Dysfunction Tagged With: block child porn, Children's Charities' Coalition, internet safety, John Carr, Mark Bridger, paedophiles, Stuart Hazell

« Previous Page
Next Page »
SPCS Facebook Page

Subscribe to website updates:

The Pilgrim’s Progress

Getting "The Pilgrim’s Progress" to
every prisoner in NZ prisons.

Recent Comments

  • John on The term ‘Homophobia’: Its Origins and Meanings, and its uses in Homosexual Agenda
  • SPCS on Corporate corruption in New Zealand – “Banning badly behaving company directors”
  • Anne on Corporate corruption in New Zealand – “Banning badly behaving company directors”
  • Jake on John Clancy: Troubled Global group costs Christchurch City Council another $37,000
  • Jake on John Clancy: Troubled Global group costs Christchurch City Council another $37,000

Family Values & Community Standards

  • Coalition for Marriage
  • ECPAT New Zealand
  • Family Voice Australia
  • Parents Inc.

Internet Safety

  • Netsafe Internet Safety Group

Pro-Life Groups

  • Family Life International
  • Right to Life
  • The Nathaniel Centre
  • Voice for Life
(Click here for larger image)

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.