The Deputy Chief Censor. Ms Nicola McCully, whose statutory position expired on the 18th of September 2005, and yet remains on in her job, confirmed in a Sunday Star Times interview (13/08/06), that 80% of her time and that of the 16 censors in the Classification Unit, is devoted to the careful examination, classification and registration of DVDs and videos featurng sexually explicit adult material (hardcore porn sleaze). McCully who recieves a salary package of between $150,000 and $160,000 joined the team at the Classification Office in 1994 after leaving her first ever full-time job as a primary school teacher aide. Her boss, Chief Censor Bill Hastings, who heads the Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC) and whose statutory position expired in mid-October 2006; receives a salary package of between $190,000 and $200,000. Precisely 82.21% of the combined salaries of these two Executive members funds their respective roles in the three-stage classification process of largely hardcore pornographic publications. In 2004/05 this amounted to $271,293 and in 2005/06 the contribution was $287,735, (remuneration costs in achieving Output 1 – defined as the examination, classification and registration of all publications dealt with in one financial year).
Minister of Internal Affairs, Hon. Rick Barker, answers written questions on Classification Office
Questions from National MP Sandra Goudie (MP for Coromandel
& Spokesperson for Internal Affairs):
Order Paper, Debates (Hansard), Questions, Daily progress, Journals
Questions for written answer
13510 (2006). Sandra Goudie to the Minister of Internal Affairs (28 Sep 2006): How many DVDs, films and videos were classified in 2005/06 as R18 publications because of explicit sexual content, sexual violence or offensive sexual content that degrades, demeans or dehumanises women?
Society exposes NZ Aids Foundation’s failed policies on HIV/AIDS prevention
Press Release 19/05/06
The NZ AIDS Foundation’s (NZAF) response to the SPCS press release (Scoop 12/05/06) that dealt with NZAF’s promotion of condoms to prevent HIV/AIDS transmission, demonstrates why this homosexual-lobby fringe group is so ineffective in reducing this growing health crisis amongst the “gay” community.
Society Responds to NZ AIDS Foundation’s Spurious Claims
Press Release 12/05/06
The New Zealand AIDS Foundation strongly rejects claims that its new “safe sex” advertisement, featured in the latest issue of gay magazine Jack, is pornographic (Scoop 11/05). This is about as true as their spurious claim that condoms will prevent the transmission of the HIV virus.
Society responds to Whitcoulls and Chief Censor over "gay" magazine row
Press Release: 11 May 2006
The Society has written an open letter to Whitcoulls (NZ) congratulating its management for refusing to stock the “gay” magazine JACK. It has responded to the arguments put forward by Chief Censor, Bill Hastings, that sexually explicit NZ AIDS Foundation ads in the magazine promoting ‘safe-sex’ via condom use are in the “public good”.