• Home
  • About
  • Objectives
  • Membership
  • Donations
  • Activities
  • Research Reports
  • Submissions
  • Newsletters
  • Contact

SPCS

SOCIETY FOR PROMOTION OF COMMUNITY STANDARDS INC.

  • Censorship
    • Censorship & New Technology
    • Film Ratings
    • Films
  • Crime
    • Rape statistics
    • Television Violence
    • Violence
    • Youth Crime
  • Enforcement
  • Family
    • Anti-smacking Bill
    • Families Commission
    • Marriage
  • Gambling Addiction
  • Political Advocacy
  • Pro-life
    • Abortion
  • Prostitution
  • Sexuality
    • Child Sex Crimes
    • Civil Unions
    • HIV/AIDS STIs
    • Homosexuality
    • Kinsey Fraud
    • Porn Link to Rape
    • Pornography
    • Sex Studies
    • Sexual Dysfunction
  • Other
    • Alcohol abuse
    • Announcement
    • Application For Leave
    • Broadcasting Standards Authority
    • Celebrating Christian Tradition
    • Children’s Television
    • Complaints to Broadcasters
    • Computer games
    • Film & Lit Board Reviews
    • Film & Lit. Board Appointments
    • Human Dignity
    • Moral Values
    • Newsletters
    • Newspaper Articles
    • Recommended Books
    • Submissions
    • YouTube

Fidelity in marriage an issue for gay men – NZ Herald article by lecturer and author – Laurie Guy

August 31, 2012 by SPCS Leave a Comment

All you need is love. That is the theme song of pro-same-sex marriage proponents. It is the slogan of Louisa Wall, author of the same-sex marriage bill. If two gay people love each other and want to “marry”, why don’t we allow this? But is love enough?

In answering that question, we need to be aware of two other questions: what is marriage? And why is the state involved? The latter question is crucial, because the core issue is one of affirmation, not rights – rights can be dealt with by specific legislation without amending the Marriage Act and upsetting lots of people.

Apart from conveying rights, marriage provides affirmation that the state/society encourages this relationship as a good thing. A crucial question is whether gay relationships are such a good thing as to be endorsed by society as “marriage”.

We should look at the issue of social endorsement through four lenses: love, commitment, health, and society’s interests.

Let’s begin with love. What is “love”? The word covers a raft of sometimes contrary meanings, from sexual desire centred on “my” self-gratification, to heroic self-giving for another. Both heterosexual and same-sex unions may well pass (or fail) this test. The love issue does not debar same-sex marriages.

However, love alone is not enough. It can be fleeting and transient. If marriage is to be serious and not trivial, it needs longevity, buttressed by commitment and faithfulness.

What of gay commitment and faithfulness? Long-term lesbian relationships on average may well be as committed and faithful as that of an average married heterosexual couple. The problem is the gay men.

Some male gay couples are as committed and faithful as typical married heterosexuals. Survey evidence, however, indicates that these are very much a minority.

Significant data on male homosexual behaviour is available through New Zealand Medical Journal articles and the New Zealand Aids Foundation website. The Aids Foundation and the Aids Epidemiology Group at the University of Otago have conducted biennial surveys, the Auckland Gay Periodic Sex Surveys, for the past decade.

The 2010 results covered the sexual behaviour of 1527 gay men in 2008. On the commitment side, the survey indicates that the most common number of sexual partners for gay men over the previous six months was two to five. Just 38.8 per cent of those surveyed had a partner of more than six months’ standing (i.e. relationships with some level of commitment).

However, 52 per cent of these men had also had sex in that period (six months) with other partners. So despite the rhetoric of love and commitment, most male gay couples are not in a genuinely monogamous relationship. Should the meaning of “marriage” be broadened under such circumstances?

There is also the health issue. Male-to-male coupling typically has far greater health risks (because of high levels of anal sex). Both with casual and with “boyfriend” sex the percentage engaging in anal sex is over 80 per cent. Anal sex is never fully safe. Although condoms reduce the risk of sexually transmitted diseases (including HIV/Aids) by around 85-90 per cent, risk remains (because of user misuse or product failure).

Risk is far greater without condom protection. Although 98 per cent of those surveyed knew that anal sex without a condom is very high risk for HIV transmission, 73 per cent did not use a condom at least once in the past six months (the figure for casual sex was 31 per cent).

The result is high levels of sexually transmitted infections amongst gay men. Over 60 per cent of new infectious syphilis cases are gay men. This category also has high rates of gonorrhoea and hepatitis. And 76 per cent of all new HIV diagnoses in 2000-2009 were gay men.

Can we affirm male gay relationships to the level of “marriage”, given the data on faithfulness and health? One can argue change on the basis of “me”, “my rights” and “choice”. But the debate is also about the good of society.

What society needs are stable, faithful, healthy relationships. Stable marriage has gravely weakened in the last generation. There is deep hurt and scarring of many, especially children, as a consequence.

In a direct sense gay “marriage” will not make this worse. Indirectly, however, it will, because it makes marriage, which for many is becoming vague and fuzzy, vaguer and fuzzier still. It is social engineering – with its negative aspects ignored.

We need to have a deep and wide debate, looking at all factors. The same-sex marriage debate is currently far too simplistic. The draft bill is a daft bill.

Laurie Guy is author of Worlds in Collision: The Gay Debate in New Zealand 1960-1986 (Victoria University Press, 2002). He lectures in church history at Auckland University’s school of theology, and also at Carey Baptist College.

Source: Fidelity in marriage an issue for gay men. 31 August 2012

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10830082

Note: The Objects of the Society for Promotion of Community Standards Inc. include: “To focus attention on the harmful nature and consequences of sexual promiscuity ……” (s. 2d of Constitution).

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: HIV/AIDS STIs, Homosexuality, Marriage, Moral Values, promiscuity Tagged With: Aids Epidemiology Group, Aids Foundation, gay marriage, gonorrhoea, hepatitis, HIV transmission, HIV/AIDS, Marriage Act, same-sex marriage

Marriage Amendment Bill – Seventy church leaders oppose same-sex marriage bill

August 29, 2012 by SPCS Leave a Comment

In a media release issued on  Wednesday 29 August 2012 …

Seventy church leaders, including numerous national heads of major church denominations both Catholic and Protestant, are speaking up in a joint personal statement on the day of the first reading of the Marriage Amendment Bill, which would allow same-sex couples to marry.

 “We have made this joint statement”, said Rev. Dr Richard Waugh, “because members of Parliament need to be in no doubt what mainstream Christian views are on this matter.”

 Joint church leaders’ statement:

“This issue is not about equality but about the nature of marriage. All human beings are equal in the sight of both God and society, but not all relationships are the same. Marriage has uniquely been about the union of male and female. The State should not presume to re-engineer a basic human institution. The complementary role of male and female is basic to the very character of marriage, along with having and raising children. Same-sex relationships are intrinsically different, so can never be regarded as true marriage.

Parliament needs to take seriously that, for a very significant proportion of the New Zealand public, marriage is more than just a legal agreement or social contract, but has a  sacred character to it, and that many people – Christian and otherwise – feel very strongly that the nature of marriage should not be interfered with.

In 2004, the public was assured by the Prime Minister and other MPs that marriage would be respected as the union of a man and a woman, and that Civil Unions were a good and acceptable alternative, offering equivalent legal protections to marriage itself. It is now time for Members of Parliament to recall and honour those assurances.”

Signed by… 

–        Rev. Dr. Richard Waugh QSM (Wesleyan Methodist, National Superintendent)

–        Archbishop John Dew (Catholic)

–        Rev. Craig Vernall (Baptist, National Leader)

–        Bishop Patrick Dunn (Catholic)

–        Rev. Dr Merv Duffy SM (Catholic, Lecturer in the Theology of Marriage

–        Rev. Dr Stuart Lange (Presbyterian; Senior Lecturer, Laidlaw College) 

–        Rev. Mark Whitfield (Lutheran, President of Lutheran Church of New Zealand)

–        Rev. Max Scott (Anglican)

–        Bishop Denis Browne (Catholic)

–        Rev. James Lee (Presbyterian)

–        Rev. Dr Sarah Harris (Anglican, New Testament Lecturer, Carey Baptist College)

–        Rev. Peter Benzie (Wesleyan Methodist, National Secretary)

–        Mr Glyn Carpenter (Director, New Zealand Christian Network)

–        Rev. Fakaofo Kaio (Presbyterian, Moderator of Northern Presbytery)

–        Rev. Rhys Pearson (Presbyterian)

–        Rev. Illiafi Esera (Assemblies of God, Superintendent)

–        Pastor Eddie Tupa’i (President, North New Zealand Conference, Seventh-day Adventist  Church)

–        Rev. Steve Maina (Anglican, New Zealand Church Missionary Society) 

–        Rev. Ian Guy (Presbyterian)

–        Bishop Charles Drennan (Catholic)

–        Rev. Kim Francis (Presbyterian)

–        Rev. Murray Robertson (Baptist)

–        Pastor Lloyd Rankin (National Director, Vineyard Churches Aotearoa New Zealand)

–        Rev. Michael Hewat (Anglican)

–        Rev. Ian Hyslop (Presbyterian)

–         Rev. Nick Kirk (Anglican, Dean of Nelson Cathedral)

–        Pastor Ken Harrison (Harvest Christian Church Papakura, AOGNZ)

–        Rev. Steve Millward (Presbyterian)

–        Bishop Barry Jones (Catholic)

–        Rev. Brian Brandon (Presbyterian)

–        Rev. Andrew Carley (Anglican, Leader Latimer Fellowship)

–        Rev. Ben Dykman (Presbyterian)

–        Rev. Mike Hawke (Anglican)

–        Pastor Mike Griffiths (Elim, National Leader)

–        Bishop Colin Campbell (Catholic)

–        Captain Peter Lloyd (Anglican, former Director, Church Army New Zealand)

–        Rev. Dr Stuart Vogel (Presbyterian)

–        Rev. Dr Myk Habets (Head of Carey Graduate School, Carey Baptist College)

–        Rev. Eric Etwell (Anglican, Administrator of AFFIRM)

–        Pastor John Steele (National Leader, New Life Churches International)

–        Rev. Dr Mark Keown (Presbyterian; Senior Lecturer, Laidlaw College)

–        Mr Peter Eccles (Chairman, Auckland Congregational Union churches)

–        Rev. Dr Neville Bartle (National Superintendent, Church of the Nazarene)

–        Rev. Steve Jourdain (Presbyterian)

–        Pastor Peter Mortlock (Senior Pastor City Impact Church)

–        Rev. Lindsay Jones (Baptist)

–        Pastor Jerry Matthews (President, New Zealand Pacific Union Conference of the Seventh  Day Adventist Church)

–        Pastor Dr Brian Hughes (Calvary Chapel)

–        Rev. Emma Keown (Presbyterian)

–        Dr Rod Thompson (Principal, Laidlaw College)

–        Dr Laurie Guy (Baptist, Vice Principal, Carey College)

–        Rev. Dr Colin Marshall (Presbyterian)

–        Pastor Rasik Ranchord (New Life Churches International

–        Rev. Andrew Marshall (National Director, Alliance Churches of New Zealand)

–        Rev. Dr Martin Macaulay (Presbyterian)

–        Pastor Bruce Monk (National Leader, Equippers Church)

–        Rev. Charles Hewlett (Principal, Carey Baptist College)

–        Pastor Alan Vink (National Director,Willow Creek Association NZ)

–        Rev. Hung-Yi Pan (Wesleyan Methodist)

–        Rev. Tom Phillips (Presbyterian)

–        Rev. Stuart Crossan (Anglican)

–        Rev. Peter Dunn (Presbyterian)

–        Rev. Ruth Boswell (Wesleyan Methodist)

–        Rev. John Gullick (Presbyterian)

–        The Very Rev. Rob Yule (Presbyterian, Former Moderator)

–        National Leadership Team (Christian Churches New Zealand)

–        Rev. Toeaina Leiite Setefano (Presbyterian – PIC)

–        Rev. Stephen Woo Taek Nam (Presbyterian)

–        Rev. Dr Geoff New (Presbyterian) 

For further comment, contact:

Rev.  Dr Richard Waugh QSM

Email: rjw@wesleyan.org.nz

Ph 09 2716460

Or

Rev. Dr Stuart Lange

Email:  smlange@xtra.co.nz
Ph 09 8325775
021-0224-2957

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Announcement, Marriage Tagged With: Marriage Amendment Act Bill, same-sex marriage

Paedophile easily got jobs at six New Zealand schools

August 22, 2012 by SPCS Leave a Comment

People “looked the other way” and allowed a convicted paedophile to work among children at six different schools over six years, a ministerial inquiry has found.

The report into the case of Te Rito Henry Miki, led by former ombudsman Mel Smith, was released yesterday.

It found “several factors” besides Miki’s “personal duplicity” had allowed his “relatively easy entry to teaching positions” despite dozens of criminal convictions, including for an indecent assault on a 14-year-old boy.

Education Minister Hekia Parata insisted “system failures rather than people failures” were to blame.

But Mr Smith last night said there were “both system failings and human failings” in the case.

“I identified the systems failings, the human failings and then provided opportunities to rectify those,” he said.

“There were people who knew his background and looked the other way.”

Mr Smith said he had “some concerns” that “some people knew his background but still employed him” but had been unable to confirm those.

His report said there had been a “failure of knowledgeable individuals to advise relevant authorities of Miki’s probable identity and criminal history” and a “willingness of individuals to pretend ignorance as to his real and stolen identities”.

“It just didn’t happen within the police,” he said.

“I found it difficult to understand how he could pull the wool over experienced probation officers’ eyes but, nevertheless, that’s what happened.”

A new 24-hour satellite surveillance programme for high-risk offenders would have prevented Miki’s offending, he said.

While under an extended supervision order for his offending, Miki used a fake CV and birth certificate to gain employment during the six years to January 2012 in six North Island schools.

In 2009, he was arrested on the grounds of a Tauranga school where he had been working, only to go on to work at another school in Auckland.

After accumulating 53 fake identities, Miki was finally arrested in February this year and pleaded guilty in April to seven charges of fraud and four counts of breaching parole conditions.

The report pinpointed Miki’s arrest at Tauranga as one of several missed opportunities to eliminate him from teaching.

The Tauranga school’s principal had “erroneously assumed” his arrest would get to the Teachers Council via the police.

One “diligent” Tauranga constable, a former teacher, had also “located all the information needed to expose Miki, but was deterred” by a lack of the necessary paperwork.

“It was clear that potentially useful information about Miki was lost because at least one concerned person was put off by overly dogmatic bureaucracy,” the report found.

Teachers Council director Peter Lind said the council had been let down.

“Not only had the principal not reported to us, the courts hadn’t reported to us nor had New Zealand Police reported to us,” he said.

Ad Feedback

However, the people involved should get “the benefit of the doubt” and the fault lay with the systems.

“Yes, they should have done that. But then we also need to say what is it that we need to do to ensure that we don’t get another Miki slipping through the cracks,” Dr Lind said.

Ms Parata said the case provided a “very serious wake-up call” for the whole state sector.

The Government had accepted or partially accepted 36 of the 39 actions recommended by the inquiry. Three were still being considered, including for biometric photographic evidence to be required for all teachers.

Source: Paedophile easily got jobs at six schools. By John Hartevelt and Andrea Vance

The Dominion Post, Wednesday, August 22, 2012, p. A3

Fairfax NZ News

– © Fairfax NZ News

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Other Tagged With: convicted paedophile, Dr Peter Lind, Education Minister Hekia Parata, Hekia Parata, ministerial inquiry, Peter Lind, Te Rito Henry Miki, Teachers Council director

VEGANZ: The Vegan Society of New Zealand Charitable Trust and political lobbying

August 20, 2012 by SPCS 2 Comments

In 2005, Ms Sandra Murray Coordinator & Trustee of  Veganz (the Vegan Society of New Zealand Charitable Trust), of which she was Coordinator & Trustee”, conducted a survey of 101 vegans in New Zealand and found that the majority became vegans primarily for animal rights reasons, with the next highest recorded being for health reasons. Environmental reasons were cited by a very smal number of respondents, roughly the same number as cited spiritual/religious reasons and allergy/intolerance reasons (Energy & Food, Iss. 83, August 2005, pp. 8-9).

The notion of animals having “rights” is a highly charged and controversial subject in the field of bioethics and ethics/philosophy. It is indisputable that humans have rights not to be killed and eaten by other humans. But do all animals have the same “rights”? Many “animal rights activists” and doctrinaire vegans sincerely believe they do. The vast majority of reasonable-minded people believe they do not. The link between “animal rights” activism and veganism is well-established.

Is it significant that a founding trustee of The Vegan Society of Aotearoa, Ms Amand Sorrenson, is currently Promotions Manager for SAFE (Save Animals From Exploitation), an “animal rights” campaigner/lobby heavily involved in “political advocacy”. (See: http://www.safe.org.nz/Contact-Safe/)? SAFE was registered as a charity with the Charities Commission on 30 June 2008 (Reg. No. CC44028).

Ms Sandra Joanne Murray is listed as “Coordinator & Trustee” of VEGANZ, on its Trust Deed and on the Statutory Declaration accompanying the application for the incorporation of VEGANZ: The Vegan Society of New Zealand Charitable Trust, witnessed by Auckland barrister, Ms Metiria Stanton Turei (currently co-leader of the Green Party MP). Both documents are dated 17 July 2002 and were uploaded onto the Companies website on 31 July 2002.

Along with three other trustees, Ms Murray’s signature is also recorded on the Application For Incorporation of VEGANZ as a Board, dated 29 July 2002 and received by the National Processing Centre of the Companies Office on 31 July 2002 (uploaded on Companies website on 31/07/2002).

On 3 October 2004 the VEGANZ Trust Deed was amended and Ratified at the Trust’s AGM. A copy was signed by Ms Sandra Murray “to be a true and correct copy of the Trust Deed of VEGASNZ: The Vegan Society of New Zealand” on 14 December 2004. It was uploaded onto the Companies website on 20 December 2004. Its registration number is 1230157.

Two of the “aims and objectives” (section 3) of VEGANZ Charitable Trust Deed make it clear that this incorporated Trust is an “animal rights” lobby group.

s. 3.5 To lobby for manufacturers to use non-animal based materials in their products.

s. 3.6 “To support ethical alternatives to animal based and/or environmentally harmful research and production and where appropriate to lobby government and non-government bodies to change such practices.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Other Tagged With: animal rights, lobby group, SAFE, Save Animals from Exploitation, vegans, VEGANZ

NZ AIDS Foundation (a registered charity) office – venue for “lobby training session” promoting gay marriage bill

August 2, 2012 by SPCS Leave a Comment

The New Zealand AIDS Foundation, was registered as a charity with the Charities Commission on 28 March 2008 (Reg. No. CC22230). It is heavily involved in “political advocacy” and is widely recognised as a gay lobby group well funded by the public purse.

The website GayNZ.com has just given an insight into its lobbying strategies drawing on the expertise of lobby/strategist, former Labour candidate Tony Milne:

“Milne has organised a lobby training session on Sunday 12 August 1PM at the Christchurch New Zealand AIDS Foundation office called “Help make marriage equality happen” to help teach people how to lobby MPs and other things they can do to support marriage equality.” [i.e. promote Green MP Louisa Wall’s “same-sex marriage” bill]

The website www.protectmarriage.org.nz has published the following quote from Tony Milne:

Quotes [http://www.protectmarriage.org.nz/quotes]

 Tony Milne helped co-ordinate the campaign for Civil Unions when working for Tim Barnett MP.

I’m one of those who prefers Civil Unions over marriage. It is modern and inclusive from its very beginning. Compared to most countries, where Civil Unions have been designed as a separate institution for same-sex couples, New Zealand chartered a different course. We created a relationship recognition that was open to both opposite-sex and same-sex couples, changed the prescribed “I take you” language to be more flexible and less possessive – and removed virtually all discrimination in New Zealand law between de facto and married/civil unionised couples!… To describe Civil Unions as a second-class institution is hurtful for some of us who are in a Civil Union. It’s just not necessary either.

http://www.gaynz.com/articles/publish/5/article_11534.php

References

For more information see:

http://www.gaynz.com/articles/publish/2/article_12067.php

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1207/S00403/anti-marriage-equality-website-misleads.htm

http://www.gaynz.com/articles/publish/5/article_11534.php

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Other

« Previous Page
Next Page »
SPCS Facebook Page

Subscribe to website updates:

The Pilgrim’s Progress

Getting "The Pilgrim’s Progress" to
every prisoner in NZ prisons.

Recent Comments

  • John on The term ‘Homophobia’: Its Origins and Meanings, and its uses in Homosexual Agenda
  • SPCS on Corporate corruption in New Zealand – “Banning badly behaving company directors”
  • Anne on Corporate corruption in New Zealand – “Banning badly behaving company directors”
  • Jake on John Clancy: Troubled Global group costs Christchurch City Council another $37,000
  • Jake on John Clancy: Troubled Global group costs Christchurch City Council another $37,000

Family Values & Community Standards

  • Coalition for Marriage
  • ECPAT New Zealand
  • Family Voice Australia
  • Parents Inc.

Internet Safety

  • Netsafe Internet Safety Group

Pro-Life Groups

  • Family Life International
  • Right to Life
  • The Nathaniel Centre
  • Voice for Life
(Click here for larger image)

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.