• Home
  • About
  • Objectives
  • Membership
  • Donations
  • Activities
  • Research Reports
  • Submissions
  • Newsletters
  • Contact

SPCS

SOCIETY FOR PROMOTION OF COMMUNITY STANDARDS INC.

  • Censorship
    • Censorship & New Technology
    • Film Ratings
    • Films
  • Crime
    • Rape statistics
    • Television Violence
    • Violence
    • Youth Crime
  • Enforcement
  • Family
    • Anti-smacking Bill
    • Families Commission
    • Marriage
  • Gambling Addiction
  • Political Advocacy
  • Pro-life
    • Abortion
  • Prostitution
  • Sexuality
    • Child Sex Crimes
    • Civil Unions
    • HIV/AIDS STIs
    • Homosexuality
    • Kinsey Fraud
    • Porn Link to Rape
    • Pornography
    • Sex Studies
    • Sexual Dysfunction
  • Other
    • Alcohol abuse
    • Announcement
    • Application For Leave
    • Broadcasting Standards Authority
    • Celebrating Christian Tradition
    • Children’s Television
    • Complaints to Broadcasters
    • Computer games
    • Film & Lit Board Reviews
    • Film & Lit. Board Appointments
    • Human Dignity
    • Moral Values
    • Newsletters
    • Newspaper Articles
    • Recommended Books
    • Submissions
    • YouTube

Charitable Status: A New Form of Social Control?

May 23, 2012 by SPCS Leave a Comment

Nicola M Drayton-Glesti, a Legal Entities lawyer at the Wellington Community Law Centre has warned ……

The Charities Commission may be exerting informal social control over community groups. If a group undertakes too much law reform or political advocacy, their charitable status could be removed. This makes community groups’ existence extremely fragile, and is very concerning: the very important “grass roots” voices in our community may slowly be silenced. We do not know how many times a group can write submissions on proposed law changes, appear in front of a Select Committee of Parliament, participate in protest meetings or write letters to the newspaper before their charitable status becomes endangered. Many are now calling for a review of the Charities Act to establish a more modern definition of the word “charitable”.

A review had been set for 2012 but now has been deferred until 2015. International comparisons may be useful here. In 2006, the Australian Tax Office (ATO) removed the charitable status of a small organisation called Aid/Watch which was set up to monitor research and report on the Australian Government’s overseas aid programme. Aid/Watch had specifically criticised the government’s spending of the Tsunami Aid Fund. They lost charitable status because of their “political activities”. In December 2010, the High Court of Australia confirmed that Aid/Watch was in fact entitled to charitable status because:

1. The distinction between politics and charity work is no longer clear. Modern charities are expected to “have a view” on government policy and write submissions etc.

2. Agitation for legislative and political change has a long history in Ausralian democracy and is reflected in the Australian constitution. Ignoring this could restrict the “freedom of speech” of charitable organisations.

The High Court concluded that “public debate by lawful means is beneficial to the community.” This decision lends weight to the early review here of the term “charitable purpose,” and gives clear guidance of what “charity” could mean in modern New Zealand society. How many groups will still be freely advocating for their communities in 2015, without the fear of losing their charitable status? Are we in danger of losing a vital piece of our democracy?

An Extract from: Charitable Status: A New Form of Social Control?

by Nicola M Drayton-Glesti, Community Lawyer – Wellington Community Law Centre

Contribution to a legal seminar on “Getting and Keeping Charitable Status” held by the Wellington Law Centre

Source: Wellington Community Law Centre – Community Newsletter October-November 2010

See: www.wclc.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/WCLC-December-2010.pdf

 

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Political Advocacy Tagged With: charitable status, Charities Act, Charities Commission, political advocacy

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SPCS Facebook Page

Subscribe to website updates:

The Pilgrim’s Progress

Getting "The Pilgrim’s Progress" to
every prisoner in NZ prisons.

Recent Comments

  • John on The term ‘Homophobia’: Its Origins and Meanings, and its uses in Homosexual Agenda
  • SPCS on Corporate corruption in New Zealand – “Banning badly behaving company directors”
  • Anne on Corporate corruption in New Zealand – “Banning badly behaving company directors”
  • Jake on John Clancy: Troubled Global group costs Christchurch City Council another $37,000
  • Jake on John Clancy: Troubled Global group costs Christchurch City Council another $37,000

Family Values & Community Standards

  • Coalition for Marriage
  • ECPAT New Zealand
  • Family Voice Australia
  • Parents Inc.

Internet Safety

  • Netsafe Internet Safety Group

Pro-Life Groups

  • Family Life International
  • Right to Life
  • The Nathaniel Centre
  • Voice for Life
(Click here for larger image)

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.