Media Release 17 June 2008
Complaint to Childrens Commissioner and Chief Censor Over Gay Pro-Abortion Propaganda, ‘Hate Speech’, Defamation, Obscenities and Exploitation of Children in a YouTube Video.
The Society has today raised formal complaints with both the Office of the Childrens’ Commissioner Dr Cindy Kiro and the Chief Censor, Bill Hastings, over a Pro-Abortion, Obscenity-ladden YouTube(NZ) video that blatantly exploits young children. The promoter of this nasty objectionable publication via the GayNZ.com website is….
Craig Young a homosexual and regular contributor to this gay lobbyist website. He is a rabid supporter of womens’ rights to have abortion on demand and “gay rights activist”.
He has vented his spleen in anger at the anti-abortionist group Right-to-Life (in particular its spokesman Ken Orr) because of its recent success in the High Court against the Abortion Supervisory Committee (ASC). The Judge ruled that the ASC had failed to fulfill its statutory duties (in part to safeguard the rights of the unborn) and that many of the approximately 18,000 abortions carried out in NZ each year, may well have been illegal.
The video depicts young children giving the fingers – a gesture utilised to mock and express hatred towards those who oppose abortion on demand. These provocations are regularly interspersed with cries of “F## You” and “You are a C###” accompanied by the provocative music of the band “Twisted Sister”.
Young expressed similar outrage some years back when five Judges the Court of Appeal unanimously ruled that the banning order against the Living Word “GayRights” Videos be quashed because they expressed nothing more than opinion. Young and his fellow gay activists were incensed, claiming that these sober, well-researched videos constituted actual hate speech, a view supported by the Chief Censor Bill Hastings. It was his decision as Deputy of the Film and Literature Board of Review, at the time, that first led to them getting banned. Following the Court of Appeal ruling the videos were reclassified as “unrestricted” by the Board and they can now be watched by anyone (including young people) interested in finding out about the real political and ‘moral’ motives that underscore the gay rights movement that Young belongs to and promotes.
The Society applauds Young’s right to have an opinion and express it in a free and democratic society, but it abhors the publication of objectionable and offensive content on a public website that shamelessly exploits children, uses obscene and vile language and demeans individuals in a manner that is defamatory etc.
END
APPENDIX: LETTERS OF COMPLAINT
The Society for Promotion of Community Standards Inc.
P.O. Box 13-683 Johnsonville
17 June 2008
Urgent Attention:
Dr Cindy Kiro, Children’s Commissioner
Office of the Children’s Commissioner
Office of the Privacy Commissioner
Level 13, Shortland Street Tower 1
51-53 Shortland Street
Auckland
New Zealand
Email: children@occ.org.nz.
Dear Dr Kiro
The Society for the Promotion of Community Standards Inc. wishes to lodge a formal complaint with your Office against those responsible for the dissemination of offensive and exploitative use images of young children in the context of a nasty, vile, inflammatory and obscene video posted on You Tube and linked to a gay website and more specifically linked to a regular contributor to that website.
Mr Craig Young, a gay activist who contributes regularly to a religious/political column on the website has posted a comment on the website Forum directing readers to an objectionable YouTube clip that it would appear he is responsible for (see links below).
It uses images of young chldren givng the fingers, interspersed with obscene abuse such as “F### OFF:” etc. and “You are CU##” to attack Mr Ken Orr, Spokesperson for a NZ based organisation Right to Life and the organisation itself.
The vitriol in the video is directed at those who have sought to recently review the actions of the New Zealand Abortion Supervisory Committee (ASC) by way of a judicial review and who are opposed to abortion on demand. Much to the disgust of Mr Craig Young, Right to Life won the case and the Judge ruled that the ASC has failed in its statutory responsibilities and that many abortions carried out under its watch, almost 18,000 per year, may have been illegal.
Mr Craig Young is a rabid pro-abortionist who campaigns for abortion on demand. Within our democracy he is entitled to his views and to express them. However, his advocacy and promotion of this publication that exploits children to heap vile and obscene abuse on a NZ citizen and his organisation must be of concern to the Children’s Commissioner. We request that this complaint be dealt with promptly.
The degrading, dehumanising or demeaning of any person via a publication can constitute it “objectionable” or restricted under s. 3(3) of the Films, Videos and Publications Classification Act 1993 (“the Act”). Content that exploits children for sexual purposes is a matter that deems a publication objectionable. The sexual nature of terms of abuse such as “F### OFF” etc. brings this publication within s. 3(3A) of the Act “… contains highly offensive language likely t cause serious harm” and/or s. 3B “… is likely to be injurious to public good for specified reasons”.
The Society is lodging a separate complaint with the Chief Censor’s Office over the publication, highlighting the concerns raised above. However, we request that you deal with our concerns raised over the exploitation of children and the inappropriate use of children in the context of public obscenity etc.
Children have a right to not be exploited.
Yours sincerely
SPCS
______________
The Society for Promotion of Community Standards Inc.
P.O. Box 13-683 Johnsonville
17 June 2008
Attention:
Mr Bill Hastings
Chief Censor
Office of Film and Literature Classification
Wellington
[Weblink deleted]
Dear Mr Hastings
The Society for the Promotion of Community Standards Inc. wishes to lodge a formal complaint with your Office against those responsible for the dissemination of offensive and exploitative use images of young children in the context of a nasty, vile, inflammatory and obscene video posted on YouTube and linked to a gay website and more specifically linked to a regular contributor to that website.
Mr Craig Young, a “gay rights activist” who contributes regularly to a religious/political column on the website has posted a comment on the GayNZ.com website Forum directing readers to an objectionable YouTube clip that it would appear he is responsible for (see links below).
It uses images of young chldren givng the fingers, interspersed with obscene abuse such as “F### OFF:” etc. and “You are CU##” to attack Mr Ken Orr, Spokesperson for a NZ based organisation Right to Life and the organisation itself.
The vitriol in the video is directed at those who have sought to recently review the actions of the New Zealand Abortion Supervisory Committee (ASC) by way of a judicial review and who are opposed to abortion on demand. Much to the disgust of Mr Craig Young, Right to Life won the case and the Judge ruled that the ASC has failed in its statutory responsibilities and that many abortions carried out under its watch, almost 18,000 per year, may have been illegal.
Mr Craig Young is a pro-abortionist who campaigns for abortion on demand. Within our democacy he is entitled to his views and to express them. However, his advocacy and promotion of this publication that exploits children to heap vile and obscene abuse on a NZ citizen and his organisation must be of concern to the OFLC. We request that this complaint be dealt with promptly.
The degrading, dehumanising or demeaning of any person via a publication can constitute it “objectionable” or restricted under s. 3(3) of the Films, Videos and Publications Classification Act 1993 (“the Act”). Content that exploits children for sexual purposes is a matter that deems a publication objectionable. The sexual nature of terms of abuse such as “F### OFF” etc. brings this publication within s. 3A of the Act “… contains highly offensive language likely to cause serious harm” and/or s. 3B “… is likely to be injurious to public good for specified reasons”.
The Society has lodged a separate complaint with the Office of the Childrens Commissioner over the publication, highlighting the concerns raised above. However, we request that you deal with our concerns raised over the objectionable content in the publication.
Children have a right to not be exploited.
Yours sincerely
SPCS
Why do you make such a big deal about the fact that he’s gay?