• Home
  • About
  • Objectives
  • Membership
  • Donations
  • Activities
  • Research Reports
  • Submissions
  • Newsletters
  • Contact

SPCS

SOCIETY FOR PROMOTION OF COMMUNITY STANDARDS INC.

  • Censorship
    • Censorship & New Technology
    • Film Ratings
    • Films
  • Crime
    • Rape statistics
    • Television Violence
    • Violence
    • Youth Crime
  • Enforcement
  • Family
    • Anti-smacking Bill
    • Families Commission
    • Marriage
  • Gambling Addiction
  • Political Advocacy
  • Pro-life
    • Abortion
  • Prostitution
  • Sexuality
    • Child Sex Crimes
    • Civil Unions
    • HIV/AIDS STIs
    • Homosexuality
    • Kinsey Fraud
    • Porn Link to Rape
    • Pornography
    • Sex Studies
    • Sexual Dysfunction
  • Other
    • Alcohol abuse
    • Announcement
    • Application For Leave
    • Broadcasting Standards Authority
    • Celebrating Christian Tradition
    • Children’s Television
    • Complaints to Broadcasters
    • Computer games
    • Film & Lit Board Reviews
    • Film & Lit. Board Appointments
    • Human Dignity
    • Moral Values
    • Newsletters
    • Newspaper Articles
    • Recommended Books
    • Submissions
    • YouTube

ASH anti-smoking “lobby group” and registered charity – attacks Tobacco Industry

May 28, 2012 by SPCS Leave a Comment

The anti-smoking lobby group ASH New Zealand Inc. (“ASH”), a registered charity with the Charities Commission, has vowed to bring the Tobacco Industry “out of the shadows”  by “holding them to account”.  ASH [“Action on Smoking and Health”] – will continue its “attack” on the industry’s appalling record of having been responsible for causing the deaths of about 5,000New Zealanders per year, and expose how some of the industry’s sales reps are “targetting” many young vulnerable Maori and Polynesian girls. It also intends to continue its vigorous campaign against NZ retailers who it accuses of deliberately “enticing” children and young persons into taking up smoking through their immoral retail advertising of the “dangerous, deadly and addictive” product – tobacco.

ASH lobby group spokesperson Mr Ben Youdan has revealed in an interview on TVNZ that in response to anti-smoking lobby groups’ “targetting” of the Tobacco Industry, the industry has  issued “threats” of “law suits” with more anticipated – to be expected he implied – from an industry that “won’t take it [their attacks] lying down”. Attacks on the industry by lobby groups – even if they are registered charities and receive extensive government funding, as does charity-lobby group ASH ($592,892 in 2010/11: see below), are not taken kindly by Tobacco industry barons whose livelihoods are seen to be under threat from the zealous lobbyists. [Read more…]

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Political Advocacy Tagged With: Action on Smoking and Health, ASH, Ben Youdan, political advocacy, smoking ban, tobacco industry, tobacco retail displays

Registered charities & “political advocacy” – protests to highlight porn & sexual violence link

May 27, 2012 by SPCS Leave a Comment

“Demonstrators have marched down Queen Street [Auckland] in front of the controversial Boobs on Bikes parade in an effort to raise awareness of the links between pornography and violence against women and children,” reported The NZ Herald on 20 August 2008.

“Around 60 protesters carried a banner saying “Pornography fuels sexual violence against women and children” as well as signs bearing slogans such as “porn fuels rape“….”

The Society for Promotion of Community Standards Inc. (SPCS) which played no part in the protest, only learnt after the event, via the media, that two charities registered with the Charities Commission – The Auckland Women’s Centre Inc. and Stop Demand Foundation – had organised the demonstration against the Boobs on Bikes event. Both charities had applied for and received a permit from the Auckland City Council for their protest march. Both had been registered as charities with the approval of Mr Trevor Garrett and the Charities Commission Registration Team, on 30 June 2008, two months prior to taking to the streets to target the porn promotion parade and its organiser. A third charity Family First New Zealand (Reg. No. CC10094), registered as a charity on 21 March 2007, issued media releases attacking the porn promotion activities of the Boobs on Bikes Parade promoter. [Read more…]

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Political Advocacy Tagged With: advocacy, Boobs on Bikes, political advocacy, sexual violence, Stop Demand Foundation, The Auckland Women's Centre

Child Poverty Action Group Inc and its political advocacy

May 26, 2012 by SPCS Leave a Comment

The Child Poverty Action Group Inc. (CPAG) was registered as a charity with the Charities Commission  on 5 June 2008 (Reg. No. CC25387). According to Wikipedia on-line, it “is a New Zealand political advocacy group for the abolition of poverty and social exclusion…. CPAG describes itself as ‘an independent charity working to eliminate child poverty in New Zealand through research, advocacy and education’. CPAG speaks out on behalf of tens of thousands of New Zealand’s poorest children…”

Records from the Charities Commission website show that CPAG had a gross income of $132,361 for the financial year ended 31 March 2011, and of that, $62,638 was spent on wages for one full-time employee and two other part-timers: involved in administration and research (47% of total income). In addition $1,033 of CPAG income was spent specifically on office administration and $486 to cover employees’ ACC Levies. 58 hours per week (average) in total of paid work, was funded by CPAG. In 2010/11 it received $105,000 in non-government grants and sponsorship, $16,757 in donations, and $2,660 in membership fees. (se www.charities.govt.nz).

CPAG – Aotearoa New Zealand has a clear focus on political advocacy, involving the promotion of “better policies [laws] for children and young persons – illustrated by the following activities…. [Read more…]

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Political Advocacy Tagged With: advocacy, Child Poverty Action Group, CPAG, political advocacy

Is The Definition Of Charitable Purpose Relevant To NZ? – Scoop News

May 25, 2012 by SPCS Leave a Comment

Press Release: Hayes Knight NZ  Scoop News 26 April 2012

Is The Definition Of Charitable Purpose Relevant To New Zealand Society In 2012?

The Charities Commission hosted a forum to specifically explore the appropriateness of the existing definition of “charitable purpose” in New Zealand. This two day event was held in Wellington on 17 and 18 April 2012. Those selected to attend represented a cross section of people involved in the sector; all leaders in their respective areas.

Hayes Knight Audit Director Craig Fisher was invited to the forum as a panel presenter.

Below is an extract from the paper he presented.

For Full Paper see: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU1204/S00806/is-the-definition-of-charitable-purpose-relevant-to-nz.htm

The issue of advocacy

This has been the source of much contentious, and sometimes what appears to be sensational and erroneous, media regarding decisions of the Charities Commission arising from the legal cases taken.

Political advocacy as a primary purpose is not currently considered charitable. This is especially the case when it comes to political parties which are not and should not be considered charitable. This is sound logic. [Read more…]

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Political Advocacy Tagged With: advocacy, charitable purpose, Charities Commission, definition of charitable purpose, political advocacy

Charitable Status: A New Form of Social Control?

May 23, 2012 by SPCS Leave a Comment

Nicola M Drayton-Glesti, a Legal Entities lawyer at the Wellington Community Law Centre has warned ……

The Charities Commission may be exerting informal social control over community groups. If a group undertakes too much law reform or political advocacy, their charitable status could be removed. This makes community groups’ existence extremely fragile, and is very concerning: the very important “grass roots” voices in our community may slowly be silenced. We do not know how many times a group can write submissions on proposed law changes, appear in front of a Select Committee of Parliament, participate in protest meetings or write letters to the newspaper before their charitable status becomes endangered. Many are now calling for a review of the Charities Act to establish a more modern definition of the word “charitable”.

A review had been set for 2012 but now has been deferred until 2015. International comparisons may be useful here. In 2006, the Australian Tax Office (ATO) removed the charitable status of a small organisation called Aid/Watch which was set up to monitor research and report on the Australian Government’s overseas aid programme. Aid/Watch had specifically criticised the government’s spending of the Tsunami Aid Fund. They lost charitable status because of their “political activities”. In December 2010, the High Court of Australia confirmed that Aid/Watch was in fact entitled to charitable status because:

1. The distinction between politics and charity work is no longer clear. Modern charities are expected to “have a view” on government policy and write submissions etc.

2. Agitation for legislative and political change has a long history in Ausralian democracy and is reflected in the Australian constitution. Ignoring this could restrict the “freedom of speech” of charitable organisations.

The High Court concluded that “public debate by lawful means is beneficial to the community.” This decision lends weight to the early review here of the term “charitable purpose,” and gives clear guidance of what “charity” could mean in modern New Zealand society. How many groups will still be freely advocating for their communities in 2015, without the fear of losing their charitable status? Are we in danger of losing a vital piece of our democracy?

An Extract from: Charitable Status: A New Form of Social Control?

by Nicola M Drayton-Glesti, Community Lawyer – Wellington Community Law Centre

Contribution to a legal seminar on “Getting and Keeping Charitable Status” held by the Wellington Law Centre

Source: Wellington Community Law Centre – Community Newsletter October-November 2010

See: www.wclc.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/WCLC-December-2010.pdf

 

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Political Advocacy Tagged With: charitable status, Charities Act, Charities Commission, political advocacy

« Previous Page
Next Page »
SPCS Facebook Page

Subscribe to website updates:

The Pilgrim’s Progress

Getting "The Pilgrim’s Progress" to
every prisoner in NZ prisons.

Recent Comments

  • John on The term ‘Homophobia’: Its Origins and Meanings, and its uses in Homosexual Agenda
  • SPCS on Corporate corruption in New Zealand – “Banning badly behaving company directors”
  • Anne on Corporate corruption in New Zealand – “Banning badly behaving company directors”
  • Jake on John Clancy: Troubled Global group costs Christchurch City Council another $37,000
  • Jake on John Clancy: Troubled Global group costs Christchurch City Council another $37,000

Family Values & Community Standards

  • Coalition for Marriage
  • ECPAT New Zealand
  • Family Voice Australia
  • Parents Inc.

Internet Safety

  • Netsafe Internet Safety Group

Pro-Life Groups

  • Family Life International
  • Right to Life
  • The Nathaniel Centre
  • Voice for Life
(Click here for larger image)

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.