• Home
  • About
  • Objectives
  • Membership
  • Donations
  • Activities
  • Research Reports
  • Submissions
  • Newsletters
  • Contact

SPCS

SOCIETY FOR PROMOTION OF COMMUNITY STANDARDS INC.

  • Censorship
    • Censorship & New Technology
    • Film Ratings
    • Films
  • Crime
    • Rape statistics
    • Television Violence
    • Violence
    • Youth Crime
  • Enforcement
  • Family
    • Anti-smacking Bill
    • Families Commission
    • Marriage
  • Gambling Addiction
  • Political Advocacy
  • Pro-life
    • Abortion
  • Prostitution
  • Sexuality
    • Child Sex Crimes
    • Civil Unions
    • HIV/AIDS STIs
    • Homosexuality
    • Kinsey Fraud
    • Porn Link to Rape
    • Pornography
    • Sex Studies
    • Sexual Dysfunction
  • Other
    • Alcohol abuse
    • Announcement
    • Application For Leave
    • Broadcasting Standards Authority
    • Celebrating Christian Tradition
    • Children’s Television
    • Complaints to Broadcasters
    • Computer games
    • Film & Lit Board Reviews
    • Film & Lit. Board Appointments
    • Human Dignity
    • Moral Values
    • Newsletters
    • Newspaper Articles
    • Recommended Books
    • Submissions
    • YouTube

Banned company director faces battle in Court

March 25, 2011 by SPCS Leave a Comment

A banned company director with a chequered business past and who has threatened many New Zealanders with court action, is shortly to face a battle in court over his business activities.The Deputy Registrar of the Companies Office, Peter Barker, called for a “substantial” period of probibition to be imposed on this gentleman: he is currently banned from directing, promoting or managing a company. However, despite the ban – it is business as usual as far as he is concerned.

He continues to pursue what commentators are suggesting is whimpish ‘Fingers in the Till’ ‘business’ chicanery, without enforcement agencies being able, thus far, to reign him in.

It’s all perfectly legal he or his lawyer retorts when his business activities are challenged. Such a ‘defence’ is reminiscent of leading politicians caught like proverbial ‘possums in the glare of the moral headlights’, who cry out “I’ve done no wrong … I’ve broken no law!”. Then when public controversy erupts over their activities, they resign or are forced to resign so they can deal with the fall-out.

Yes politics IS a grubby little business (like peddling porn, prostitution and money laundering).

What moral authority, if any, are such politicians who claim innocence of ‘wrong doing’, appealing to? The Courts, the Companies Office, or the Securities Commission? Surely it’s not the Court of public opinion or that of a ‘Higher Power’? God forbid it!

Directors of companies promoting hardcore porn and the prostitution may well argue that they are operating within the law because these ‘industries’ are legal. However, the vast majority of New Zealanders find these ‘industries’ morally corrosive, putrid, repugnant, and injurious to the “public good” and contend that this argument based on legality, is philosophically bankrupt.

It’s significant that when some company directors are banned by an Order issued by the Registrar of Companies, they refuse to comply with it, employing all manner of chicanery to foil the enforcement agencies. Why? Because they have little respect for the law, whether it be the moral law or any other law.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Moral Values, Other Tagged With: banned company director, Companies Office

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

SPCS Facebook Page

Subscribe to website updates:

The Pilgrim’s Progress

Getting "The Pilgrim’s Progress" to
every prisoner in NZ prisons.

Recent Comments

  • John on The term ‘Homophobia’: Its Origins and Meanings, and its uses in Homosexual Agenda
  • SPCS on Corporate corruption in New Zealand – “Banning badly behaving company directors”
  • Anne on Corporate corruption in New Zealand – “Banning badly behaving company directors”
  • Jake on John Clancy: Troubled Global group costs Christchurch City Council another $37,000
  • Jake on John Clancy: Troubled Global group costs Christchurch City Council another $37,000

Family Values & Community Standards

  • Coalition for Marriage
  • ECPAT New Zealand
  • Family Voice Australia
  • Parents Inc.

Internet Safety

  • Netsafe Internet Safety Group

Pro-Life Groups

  • Family Life International
  • Right to Life
  • The Nathaniel Centre
  • Voice for Life
(Click here for larger image)

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.