• Home
  • About
  • Objectives
  • Membership
  • Donations
  • Activities
  • Research Reports
  • Submissions
  • Newsletters
  • Contact

SPCS

SOCIETY FOR PROMOTION OF COMMUNITY STANDARDS INC.

  • Censorship
    • Censorship & New Technology
    • Film Ratings
    • Films
  • Crime
    • Rape statistics
    • Television Violence
    • Violence
    • Youth Crime
  • Enforcement
  • Family
    • Anti-smacking Bill
    • Families Commission
    • Marriage
  • Gambling Addiction
  • Political Advocacy
  • Pro-life
    • Abortion
  • Prostitution
  • Sexuality
    • Child Sex Crimes
    • Civil Unions
    • HIV/AIDS STIs
    • Homosexuality
    • Kinsey Fraud
    • Porn Link to Rape
    • Pornography
    • Sex Studies
    • Sexual Dysfunction
  • Other
    • Alcohol abuse
    • Announcement
    • Application For Leave
    • Broadcasting Standards Authority
    • Celebrating Christian Tradition
    • Children’s Television
    • Complaints to Broadcasters
    • Computer games
    • Film & Lit Board Reviews
    • Film & Lit. Board Appointments
    • Human Dignity
    • Moral Values
    • Newsletters
    • Newspaper Articles
    • Recommended Books
    • Submissions
    • YouTube

NZ White Collar Crime: Two guilty in million-dollar fraud cases

December 8, 2010 by SPCS Leave a Comment

The SPCS contends that some of the more spectacular symptoms that reveal how New Zealand society has lost its moral bearings, include the steady growth in its million dollar white collar crime ‘industry’, involving fraud, bribery, theft, and dishonesty etc. Hitting the headlines with growing regularity it seems, are middle-aged grey-haired balding, or completely bald company directors, who, having been banned by the Registrar of Companies under section 385 of the Companies Act 1993 from directing, managing or promoting a company for up to five years; are subsequenly convicted and sentenced for committing multiple breaches of such banning orders, at the same time having committed serial criminal offences involving fraud etc.

Some having been banned because they pose a serious financial risk to the public because of their mismanagement of company financial matters and/or financial incompetence, despite having a degree or two such as an MBA, deliberately give the ‘the two-fingered salute’ to the Registrar of Companies who imposed the ban on them; caring little about any moral standards, the rule of law or the vulnerability of the public to their financial risk-taking and gross incompetence. Others banned from being directors after being declared bankrupts in the Courts, give the same insulting salute and box on as trumped up ‘directors’, in the self-declared role of “promoter” and/or highly paid “consultant”.

Such flagrant deception when exposed by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) makes a complete mockery of the sanctions (prohibitions) imposed on such former directors by the Companies Office via the Courts, unless such crimes are severely punished by Judges at sentencing. The SPCS contends that banned company directors who deliberately and knowlingly breach banning orders should be jailed long-term and made to make full reparation. It believes that the vast majority of New Zealanders would probably support this view.

It is reassuring to the public to read in he Dominion Post report of 3 December 2010 that… On 3 December “in Wellington District Court, bankrupt Alan Edwards Wycherley, 52, who had been using the name of clients of a debt management company to get money from an Auckland finance firm, was jailed for three years. He had pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud, nine charges of running a company while prohibited and two of illegally signing shareholder forms.”

He was one of “two Waikanae men who appeared before the courts the same morning, in unrelated million-dollar fraud cases, in which one falsely claimed a client was terminally ill and the other submitted dodgy loan applications.” Both were sentenced by Judge Behrens.

See full report: 3 December 2010 http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/wellington/4418021/Two-guilty-of-million-dollar-fraud

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Crime, Moral Values Tagged With: banned company directors, Banned Director, bribery, Companies Act 1993, Fraud, fraud cases, million-dollar fraud, s. 385, section 385, section 385 ban, Serious Fraud Office, SFO, theft, White-collar crime

Parents [in Manukau City – Auckland] ‘put teens into sex work’

December 4, 2010 by SPCS Leave a Comment

Just as the Society (SPCS) predicted when it presented its written and oral submissions to the Justice and Electoral Seclect Committee considering the Prostitution Reform Bill back in 2001-2003; the decriminalisation of prostitution has indeed led to a growth in under- age girls working as prostitutes on city streets, in some cases even supported by their parents acting as pimps. With the passing of the Prostitution Reform Act (PRA), which the Society so vigorously and publicly opposed at the time, prostitution (including pimping, living off the earnings of prostitution and street soliciting for sex) in effect became legal.

 As the New Zealand Herald reported today, girls as young as 13 are regularly working as prostitutes, supported in some cases by their parent(s), to pay for drug habits in Manukau City. Soliciting by under-age girls has also been documented in other New Zealand cities.

To address this problem, exacerbated by the passing of the PRA, the Manukau City (Regulation of Prostitution in Specified Places) Bill is being considered by politicians and Councillors.

See Parents ‘put teens into sex work’. By Andrew Koubaridis.

“Teenagers in South Auckland are being sent to work as prostitutes by their parents to pay for drugs, says an Auckland Council member…”

 http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10691979

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Prostitution Tagged With: Manukau City (Regulation of Prostitution in Specified Places) Bill, Prostitution Reform Act

The real harms of prostitution – MercatorNet

November 28, 2010 by SPCS Leave a Comment

Why would we legalise what women who have experienced it call ‘paid rape’ and voluntary slavery’?

What is prostitution really like for the person in it? Recently The Economist ran a debate online about legalising prostitution. Putting the case against was San Francisco psychologist Melissa Farley, who is also the founder of Prostitution Research and Education. In view of the relentless campaign to legalise prostitution on the ground that it would then be essentially harmless and a matter of choice, MercatorNet invited Dr Farley to set out the facts of the matter as she knows them from 15 years of research and dealings with prostituted and trafficked women.

Source: MercatorNet 18 October 2010 http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/the_real_harms_of_prostitution

[Note. One of the Society’s objectives is: “To focus attention on the harmful nature and consequence of sexual promiscuity, obscenity, pornograhy and violence.” Society members have analysed the extensive publications of Dr Melissa Farley relating to prostitution in preparing submissions over the last few years to City Councils on proposed by-law changes relating to the control of prostitution].

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Human Dignity, Prostitution Tagged With: Dr Melissa Farley, legalising prostitution, Melissa Farley, Prostitution, Prostitution Research and Education

Cheyenne Insurance (NZ) Ltd – Chameleon-like change to Investment Company

November 28, 2010 by SPCS Leave a Comment

The report entitled Cheyenne Insurance Company (NZ) Ltd: When is an ‘insurance’ company a real insurance company? was published on this website on 20 October, 2010. Just seven days later the company’s director and owner, John Malcolm Carr, a San Antonio Texas-based CPA, changed the so-called ‘insurance’ company’s name on the NZ Companies on-line register, one it had had since 9 August 1994, to a new name Cheyenne INVESTMENT Company (NZ) Ltd [Emphasis added].

Why did this US businessman need to make this change on 27 October 2010 after calling it an INSURANCE company since 1994. The answer relates to the passing by parliament on 7 September 2010 of the Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2010 (see 20 October report) outlawing the use of the word “insurance” in a company name, when the company does not have authorisation to engage in insurance transactions.

See: US-based critic of economy [John M Carr CPA] has lots more to say

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=154653

The NZ public and Society (SPCS) members expect the Society, which seeks as one of its objectives “to foster public awarenes of the benefits to social, economic and moral welfare, of community standards, and to encourage constructive debate and discussion in this area”; to be a ‘watchdog’ on matters that impact the maintenance of the public good. [Read more…]

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Other Tagged With: Cheyenne Insurance Company (NZ) Ltd, Cheyenne Investment Company (NZ) Ltd, Companies Act 1993, CPA, Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2010, Insurance Council of New Zealand, insurance transactions, John M Carr, John Malcolm Carr, property development company, property investment company, Public Trustee of New Zealand, San Antonio, Texas, US-NZ citizenship

Penalties for breaches of S. 385 Banning order by banned NZ Company Director

November 27, 2010 by SPCS Leave a Comment

In view of the growing numbers of New Zealand company directors, MPs and business leaders who have been convicted in the Courts for fraud, financial mismanagement, reckless trading and bribery; it is important that the penalties imposed by Judges on those convicted of such offences, be regularly reviewed, particularly in view of the financial suffering and social upheaval caused to shareholders, creditors and investors etc. by those responsible for such crimes.

Under s. 385 (1) of the Companies Act 1993, “the Registrar [of Companies] may, by notice in writing given to a person, prohibit that person from being a director or promoter of a company, or being concerned in, or taking part, whether directly or indirectly, in the management of, a company during such period not exceeding 5 years after the date of the notice as is specified in the notice. Every notice shall be published in the Gazette.”

Under S 373(4) of the Act, a person convicted of acting in contravention of a banning order notice issued under s. 385, is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years or to a fine not exceeding $200,000. Furthermore s. 386 sets out “Liability for contravening section 385 or section 385AA”

A person who acts in contravention of a notice under s. 385 or 385AA is personally liable to –

(a) a liquidator of the company for every unpaid debt incurred by the company; and

(b) a creditor of the company for a debt to that creditor incurred by the company—

while that person was so acting [against the banning order].

[Read more…]

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Crime Tagged With: bribery, Companies Act 1993, Fraud, mismanagement, reckless trading, S 374(3), s. 385, section 385

« Previous Page
Next Page »
SPCS Facebook Page

Subscribe to website updates:

The Pilgrim’s Progress

Getting "The Pilgrim’s Progress" to
every prisoner in NZ prisons.

Recent Comments

  • John on The term ‘Homophobia’: Its Origins and Meanings, and its uses in Homosexual Agenda
  • SPCS on Corporate corruption in New Zealand – “Banning badly behaving company directors”
  • Anne on Corporate corruption in New Zealand – “Banning badly behaving company directors”
  • Jake on John Clancy: Troubled Global group costs Christchurch City Council another $37,000
  • Jake on John Clancy: Troubled Global group costs Christchurch City Council another $37,000

Family Values & Community Standards

  • Coalition for Marriage
  • ECPAT New Zealand
  • Family Voice Australia
  • Parents Inc.

Internet Safety

  • Netsafe Internet Safety Group

Pro-Life Groups

  • Family Life International
  • Right to Life
  • The Nathaniel Centre
  • Voice for Life
(Click here for larger image)

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.