The SPCS (Society for Promotion of Community Standards) is opposed to all MPs who promote the homosexual lifestyle regardless of their sexual preference. The strongest proponents of this unhealthy lifestyle are of course homosexuals. Some are openly homosexual. How many are in the closet is anyones guess. Some may be misguided heterosexuals that put so-called minority rights ahead of the safety of the New Zealand public.
Some homosexuals keep their private life separate from their political life and are not detrimental to the country. However, those homosexual MPs who believe that their mission is to work for the homosexual community are a matter of concern. Below is a quote from an article by Chris Carter and Tim Barnett published in a homosexual newspaper.
As queer politicians our mission is to deliver equal rights under the law and ensure that the Government machine is working for our community.
Voters should be equally concerned if women, Christian, Jewish or Muslim candidates thought they were elected to represent their special interest group and not all New Zealanders.
The number of diagnosed cases of HIV has more than double over the last four years. This is due to the present government allowing militant homosexuals to determine the sexual health policy for the whole country. SPCS does NOT suggest that ALL homosexuals are promiscuous. But enough are extremely promiscuous including anonymous sex and group sex that they pose a risk not just to their community but to the whole country. That is why New Zealand Blood Services has a blanket ban on accepting blood from homosexuals. Rather than take this as a wake up call to try to moderate their behaviour there have been calls by some extremists in the homosexual lobby that Blood Services change their policy and accept blood from homosexuals that say they practice so called safe sex.
There are of course many other good reasons why homosexuality should not be promoted but that could fill a book.
To summarise SPCS would encourage all voters not to vote for any MP who promotes the homosexual lifestyle.
[Note: SPCS responds here to an article published by “HappyClappingHomos” on Scoop News 9 September 2005 http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0509/S00105.htm ]
Just what is the difference between a “militant” homosexual and a homosexual?
Is it possible to be a “militant” heterosexual? I’m worried I might be one.
Unhealthy lifestyle? On what grounds would you say that. As far as I can tell anyone can catch H.I.V.
Could being a white christian male be unhealthy. They seem somewhat over-represented in child sex abuse statistics.
Correlation or cause?